[00:08:28] caedesX has joined #peragro-dev
[01:02:16] thebolt2 has joined #peragro-dev
[01:02:44] ChanServ sets mode: +o thebolt
[05:53:47] caedesX has quit: calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net
[05:54:21] caedesX has joined #peragro-dev
[06:04:05] caedesX has quit: calvino.freenode.net irc.freenode.net
[06:04:32] caedesX has joined #peragro-dev
[07:08:38] sueastside has joined #peragro-dev
[07:08:39] ChanServ sets mode: +o sueastside
[08:44:41] theoblt changed nick to: thebolt
[10:06:18] caedesX changed nick to: caedes
[10:06:28] ChanServ sets mode: +v caedes
[13:57:46] caedes_ has joined #peragro-dev
[14:12:18] caedes has quit: Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)
[19:01:15] caedesX has joined #peragro-dev
[19:31:02] thebolt has joined #peragro-dev
[19:31:02] ChanServ sets mode: +o thebolt
[19:31:10] ChanServ sets mode: +v caedes
[19:39:10] PK has joined #peragro-dev
[19:39:11] ChanServ sets mode: +o PK
[19:50:11] <sueastside> CyaNox: finnally got a response:
[19:50:14] <sueastside> Dit is normaal,bij scarlet hebben enkel de vaste ip's een reverse dns, en niet de dynamische.
[19:50:20] <sueastside> eikels :/
[19:53:50] <CyaNox> sueastside: Dat is niet normaal. Vrijwel alle ISP's hebben een reverse voor hun dynamic ip's. Daarnaast zijn er heelv eel services die er vanuitgaan dat een ip een reverse dns entry heeft.
[19:54:51] <CyaNox> sueastside: Ik zou zeggen neem een static ip. Doe dan meteen 100/100 fiber ofzo.
[19:56:14] <sueastside> oh ja direct, enigste probleem is dat je een adres moet opgeven als je een aansluiting aanvraagt, welke ik niet meer zal hebben als ik het zou moeten betalen :)
[19:58:09] caedes_ has joined #peragro-dev
[20:00:42] <CyaNox> sueastside: Betaal er dan ook gewoon voor.
[20:13:55] iceeey has joined #peragro-dev
[20:13:55] ChanServ sets mode: +o iceeey
[20:15:31] caedes has quit: Connection timed out
[20:26:39] <thebolt> hi iceeey
[20:52:44] caedes has joined #peragro-dev
[21:19:54] caedes changed nick to: caedes|spring
[21:37:29] <sueastside> PK: did you have any luck with the matrix stuff?
[21:41:46] <iceeey> thebolt, http://wiki.peragro.org/index.php/Entity_System_Proposal#Example
[21:43:14] <thebolt> hm, for behaviour methods
[21:43:25] <thebolt> i think it would simplify some code if it was just written as free functions
[21:43:34] <thebolt> (and parsed one by one)
[21:43:39] <thebolt> however, it is doable this way too (i think ;)
[21:43:41] <iceeey> probably
[21:43:59] <iceeey> i agree with you
[21:45:28] <thebolt> first argument would be the entity
[21:45:36] <thebolt> for property update there would be a second argument being the property
[21:46:15] <iceeey> so one function for all updates?
[21:46:20] <thebolt> no
[21:46:28] <thebolt> one per update
[21:46:37] <thebolt> but it simplifies if the function directly get access to the data it is to operate on
[21:46:43] <iceeey> ah true
[21:47:41] <thebolt> (and the caller have that data already)
[21:48:42] <iceeey> feel free to edit it to the way you like it
[22:38:21] caedes|spring changed nick to: caedes
[22:45:56] ChanServ sets mode: +v caedes
[23:56:22] caedes_ has joined #peragro-dev